|
boy dick sucking, avs gay link list, superheroes gay comics, gay nude pictures, surferboy, air tickets, gay boy sex positions, blond gay galleries, models, massage therapists, free adult gay comics, gay horny dudes, breifs, drag, beaches, big black cock gay ass fucking, free gay mens chat sites, dac8,youngest gay pictures, gay pictures for myspace, cruising, gay rimming thumbs, gay sex personals in nova scotia, hollywood, jerkoff,
|
Neyer concludes that the answer to this question is, free gay male chat quite simply, Houston, citing the Cubs' free gay male chat "luck" in 1-run games last year as an indicator that Chicago wasn't as good as its 2003 record indicates. The Cubs were 27-17 in one-run games (in the National League, only the Giants were better), and the Cardinals were 14-25 in one-run games (only the Mets were worse). There is one, and only one, legitimate explanation for those free gay male chat one-run records, and that explanation is blind luck. I know many of you believe that one-run records are determined largely by bullpens and/or "chemistry," but there simply isn't any evidence that either of those plays a significant factor in one-run games. Last year in one-run games, the Tigers had a winning record (19-18) and the Braves had a losing record (17-25). Neyer concludes that while the Cubs will enter 2004 an improved team, it likely won't be enough to offset both the inevitable decline in "luck" and the improvements the Astros have made to their rotation.
|
